Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Collison between bus and Eurostar, in France In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380977/32628/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:44, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
No problem, broadgage.

I find it increasingly frustrating in my quest to find links to any 'news website' which isn't now hidden behind a firewall, subscription-only or membership sign up.
All I want to do is widen their readership.

CfN.

| Re: The future for trains in the South West when nationalised? In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [380976/32155/40] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 23:23, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Not quite sure where to put this (and it is opposite of cuts as per thread title) so happy for mods to find better thread
A speech at TransCity South 2026 said potential for £14bn growth and 238,000 jobs in South West if Rail is improved
A speech at TransCity South 2026 said potential for £14bn growth and 238,000 jobs in South West if Rail is improved
I have cheated (because I can - I'm an admin
) and amended the heading of this particular topic to make it more neutral, while still reflecting its point.CfN.

| Re: Collison between bus and Eurostar, in France In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380975/32628/52] Posted by broadgage at 22:55, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
With thanks for your alert, broadgage, I think the link you actually meant to post is at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c6zxz4dyvdq4t
CfN.
CfN.

Yes, the link that I posted was to Breaking news" but goes to whatever is the CURRENT breaking news story. I tested it immediately after posting, and it worked then.
| Re: Collison between bus and Eurostar, in France In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380974/32628/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:38, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
With thanks for your alert, broadgage, I think the link you actually meant to post is at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c6zxz4dyvdq4t
CfN.

| Re: Collison between bus and Eurostar, in France In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380973/32628/52] Posted by broadgage at 21:56, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
News report
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cqy7lxd104xet
| Collison between bus and Eurostar, in France In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380972/32628/52] Posted by broadgage at 21:52, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Reported as 19 injured, 2 critical.
Note that these are very early reports, and that later reports may be more accurate, or more detailed.
I am not aware of anything costing less than 5p
I've just found, in a UK online supplier, a surface-mount "zero ohm resistor" priced at 0.2p + VAT. The minimum order quantity is 10, which would set you back 2p. Handling and postage charges (and the inability to pay with coins) ruin the idea.
| Re: What's new? request stops! In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [380970/32515/52] Posted by RailCornwall at 21:21, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Similar exists in Switzerland
On my bucket list is this little Swiss gem where you press a button and get let onto the platform when the train arrives.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=872240239294812
Sadly I can't see an equivalent in the Avon Gorge staying unmolested by vandals for long.
The MIB is an odd little line which can be done completely during a brief interval at Meiringen on the Luzern - Interlaken line. I seem to recall when I did it that the car was really drafty yet from whence the draft came was difficult to identify.
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380969/32623/1] Posted by RailCornwall at 20:56, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Fuel and loose foodstuff inflation would be hit if values under 5p were abolished.
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380968/32623/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:35, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
My personal view is that we may as well do away with the current copper (cupro-nickel) coins. We'll just deal in multiples of 5p. That's the least you'll get, these days - even in a charity shop.

| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380967/32623/1] Posted by bobm at 20:19, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
The minimum stamp for a second class letter is 91p.
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380966/32623/1] Posted by broadgage at 19:59, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Incidentally, why ‘dismalisation’ CfN? Old money was a bit of fun, but the ‘new’ stuff is a lot more practical isn’t it?
It strikes me that had £sd survived, we would by now be on the brink of withdrawing denominations below the shilling anyway - can anyone think of anything that costs less than 5p? And then there’s the general abandonment of cash: without the need to fiddle for change, I suspect a lot of people are quite vague about the precise cost of things below £1.
That having been said, I have of late brought cash back into my life - partly for contrarian reasons. I am surprised how often people gasp in amazement when you try to pay them with, er, money.
It strikes me that had £sd survived, we would by now be on the brink of withdrawing denominations below the shilling anyway - can anyone think of anything that costs less than 5p? And then there’s the general abandonment of cash: without the need to fiddle for change, I suspect a lot of people are quite vague about the precise cost of things below £1.
That having been said, I have of late brought cash back into my life - partly for contrarian reasons. I am surprised how often people gasp in amazement when you try to pay them with, er, money.
I am not aware of anything costing less than 5p, but there is still a use for smaller coins. What about cheaper food stuffs that sell for say 15p. In the absence of smaller coins, the minmum price increase would be to 20 pence, an increase of over 30%.
There is a large variety of platform lengths in South West and really, not sorting out historic deficiencies, and adding some modular sections seems a bit penny pinching.
Really platforms on the main and secondary lines (I am not including branch lines which only see short trains) ought to be minimum of 145 metres.
145m allows pairs of 3car units when busy (or triple 2car units), although I hope future stock doesn't have 2car units. It is also long enough for 5car IET or cross country voyager.
Having lived in Kingston upon Thames 1998-2020, and commuted into London, more than familiar with the Waterloo 10car scheme where a kit of modular platform extensions was used to extend most platforms from 165-190m to about 205m. There were standard bits for cuttings, embankments, filling in former loading docks etc. At Kingston even built an extension over a road and beyond other side of road bridge.
If all these modular standard parts can be used on dozens of South West London stations, why can't they be used for Bristol suburban and South West England. Platform extensions when line is closed are relatively cheap compared to building lifts
It would also fix the operationally difficult (and therefore more costly) problem of forming mixed fleets of 2car + 3car trains, and problems like XC voyagers can't call at Ivybridge as they don't have selective door control
| From Swindon - East and West good, what about south and north? In "Swindon to Gloucester / Cheltenham" [380964/32627/38] Posted by grahame at 19:16, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
From the Swindon Advertiser
Mixed response as direct Birmingham to Swindon route questioned
Plans to restore a direct rail link between Swindon and Birmingham have sparked a lively debate on social media, with many residents welcoming the prospect of easier travel while others questioned ticket prices, the economic benefits and whether the project will ever become reality.
[snip]
Under the plans, Swindon would be linked to Birmingham via Stroud and Stonehouse through a new hourly service. The route could provide more than two million extra seats every year and up to 130 additional trains per week.
[snip]
"We also need a direct train to Southampton."
Gary Timmins simply described the announcement as "About time", while Sally Cole asked the question on many readers' minds: "Great!!!!! When? ?? ??"
[snip]
Several people suggested that high ticket prices remain a bigger issue than the availability of direct routes.
Adam Czop said: "Train ticket prices are unacceptable; traveling by train is completely unprofitable. If you want to reduce car use, make a cheap tickets."
Alan Wilson agreed, saying rail travel can still be prohibitively expensive despite railcard discounts.
Some residents also questioned how much demand there would be for travel between the two destinations.
Chris Wheeler joked: "you don't know who to feel more sorry for, those going to swindon or those going to birmingham."
Plans to restore a direct rail link between Swindon and Birmingham have sparked a lively debate on social media, with many residents welcoming the prospect of easier travel while others questioned ticket prices, the economic benefits and whether the project will ever become reality.
[snip]
Under the plans, Swindon would be linked to Birmingham via Stroud and Stonehouse through a new hourly service. The route could provide more than two million extra seats every year and up to 130 additional trains per week.
[snip]
"We also need a direct train to Southampton."
Gary Timmins simply described the announcement as "About time", while Sally Cole asked the question on many readers' minds: "Great!!!!! When? ?? ??"
[snip]
Several people suggested that high ticket prices remain a bigger issue than the availability of direct routes.
Adam Czop said: "Train ticket prices are unacceptable; traveling by train is completely unprofitable. If you want to reduce car use, make a cheap tickets."
Alan Wilson agreed, saying rail travel can still be prohibitively expensive despite railcard discounts.
Some residents also questioned how much demand there would be for travel between the two destinations.
Chris Wheeler joked: "you don't know who to feel more sorry for, those going to swindon or those going to birmingham."
A second hourly train up the from Swindon via Kemble and Stroud, then via Cheltenham up to Birmingham would make sense. The line is double track all the way apart from the junction north of Stonehouse, and there are significant intermediate flows. Joking apart, Birmingham is very much the jumping off point for the rest of the Midlands, north of England, North Wales and Scotland.
Swindo to Birmingham ran under operation Princess (VS0) but that was short-lived.
Direct train to Southampton? There already is one at 06:03. There isn't a direct one back at all. Seriously, the Park Report of circa 2000 make an excellent case for a Swindon - Southampton service every hour, and a very constrained one ran from 2001 to 2006.
| Re: Jonathan Jones-Pratt, RIP In "Who's who on Western railways" [380963/32626/2] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:04, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Oh, No!

I never met him, but I have the greatest regard for him in his efforts on the West Somerset Railway - he has been featured and quoted here on the Coffee Shop forum, many times over the years.
My sincere sympathy to his partner Hollie Bowden, his family and his friends.
Chris from Nailsea.

| Jonathan Jones-Pratt, RIP In "Who's who on Western railways" [380962/32626/2] Posted by grahame at 18:51, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr2keqjvqp2wo
Tributes have been paid to the chairman of the country's longest heritage railway, who has passed away at the age of 42.
Jonathan Jones-Pratt ran the West Somerset Railway since 2019 and is credited by the company with guiding it through a "challenging" period.
His partner, Hollie Bowden said she was "utterly heartbroken and shattered" by his sudden death after a short illness.
The railway said it was "deeply saddened" by the news, and added Jones-Pratt had "demonstrated unwavering commitment, resilience and dedication to the railway".
Jonathan Jones-Pratt ran the West Somerset Railway since 2019 and is credited by the company with guiding it through a "challenging" period.
His partner, Hollie Bowden said she was "utterly heartbroken and shattered" by his sudden death after a short illness.
The railway said it was "deeply saddened" by the news, and added Jones-Pratt had "demonstrated unwavering commitment, resilience and dedication to the railway".
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380960/32623/1] Posted by eXPassenger at 18:12, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
I remember the 50p piece being called a 'Wilson' as it was 2 faced and 7 sided. The then prime minister was Harold Wilson.
| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380959/32325/3] Posted by JohnM at 17:40, 15th October 2026 Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, TaplowGreen | ![]() |
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.

I have to admit that change feels sensible
If you just mean it's sensible because it reduces GWR's workload, then sure. But why stop at 15-29 min delays?
Apologies if I'm missing something.
You're probably not missing anything. I was expressing something of a personal view of the pallava of claiming a small amount - the cost to both sides. I am not a fan of "compensation society" where we're looking at small sums where we really want to have the service we have bought, and not some sort of alternative to make up. When it get to / above a certain level, then , yes. I guess I am so used to over 100 minutes between trains that 30 minutes feels like nothing.
About the "compensation society" - I see what you mean; it's not like I need the £1.25 they refund me for a 15 minute delay in my commute. But on the other hand, I work hard and I'm a tight northener - I don't like throwing money away. If I've paid for a service which isn't delivered then I feel a bit cheated, and the nominal compensation goes a long way in preventing that. And I think that's a benefit to GWR - people might be annoyed at being delayed, but they'd be even more annoyed if they didn't feel they had any comeback. That £1.25 is more than just money.
I fully agree that it would be much better to have a reliable, punctual service. But I don't see how taking away the existing compensation system helps that; in fact, doesn't it mean GWR feel less obliged to provide such a service? "Oh, we're only going to be 20 mins late, it won't cost us anything; no need to rush"

| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380957/32613/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 17:32, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
You set the parameters at "a general better level of service", you are getting rather specific now!

Yep, that's why it's an e=x=a=m=p=l=e asking whether such a setup would be considered "better".
Ticketing suggestions seem sound, and you would have thought that with one organisation rather than numerous TOCs consistency would be much easier in that context, but we'll see. I doubt anything that reduces overall revenue will gain much traction given her other comments about reducing subsidy!
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................
Simplifying tickets - and truly doing so in a modernising way and not as a sneaky way for a general uplift of income while claiming "no rises" would be welcome. Sadly it would reduce the need for many of the skills and knowledge of members here, but that's progress. It would also progress, with gates like they do in The Netherlands, for 99.9% of tickets rather than what feels like 80% and so the need for so much work looking after fare advise, collection and checking.
I think if someone promises “No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.” - most reasonable people would accept that as a "general better level of service" Graham, but hopefully your more exacting requirements will be met.
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380956/32623/1] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:09, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Another comment from me, if I may, regarding the use of coins?
We are fortunate to have a family business, situated the other side of Clevedon from us in Nailsea, who run a free-range chicken emporium. They deliver in Nailsea, and take cash only. They ask £1.50 for half a dozen very fresh, organic, eggs.
They arrived at our front door this afternoon, so I grabbed £3 in coins from our money box in the lounge and bought a dozen. Tesco charge £2.90 for six!

CfN.

| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380955/32325/3] Posted by grahame at 16:56, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.

I have to admit that change feels sensible
If you just mean it's sensible because it reduces GWR's workload, then sure. But why stop at 15-29 min delays?
Apologies if I'm missing something.
You're probably not missing anything. I was expressing something of a personal view of the pallava of claiming a small amount - the cost to both sides. I am not a fan of "compensation society" where we're looking at small sums where we really want to have the service we have bought, and not some sort of alternative to make up. When it get to / above a certain level, then , yes. I guess I am so used to over 100 minutes between trains that 30 minutes feels like nothing.
An update, from the BBC:
Campaigners await platform extension study verdict

Conservative MP Rebecca Smith and John Pope from the Ivybridge Rail Users Group have both campaigned for a more reliable service for the town
Campaigners hoping to get a more frequent rail service at a station are "waiting anxiously" on the results of a survey looking into the possibility of extending the platforms.
On average currently only about 30% of the trains which pass through Ivybridge station stop there, a main factor of this being the short 104m (341ft) platforms.
Network Rail have conducted the £20,000 feasibility survey, which was funded by South Hams District Council into the possible expansion of the platforms, with the final costings being "undertaken and expect the report to be ready later this month".
GWR and Cross Country both support and welcome the proposals in a bid to improve rail services offered in the town. The two platforms at the station are too short to accommodate Cross Country's trains, which are a minimum of about 110m (360ft) long, as well as GWR's express and longer trains.
John Pope, chair of the Ivybridge Rail Users Group - which has campaigned for more rail services in the area for 21 years, said there was "currently an irregular service" in the town which was "very frustrating". He said the "timetables have not changed with the times - Ivybridge is now significantly bigger than it once was and the service has never reflected that".
"If the service was there, we are confident people would use it," Pope added.

The Ivybridge Rail Users Group have campaigned for better services at the station for 21 years
Cross Country said its trains could not fit on the platform, and its "train doors cannot be opened individually" so extending the platforms could "create the opportunity to connect this part of South Devon into our network".
While GWR said it supported the "long-term ambitions for improved rail services at Ivybridge and welcome the chance to call more services there".
Conservative MP for South West Devon Rebecca Smith conducted a travel survey where 94% of respondents in Ivybridge wanted more trains to stop there with 80% more likely to use the train more often if that was the case.
Matthew Dorsett, who was catching a train, said he would use the station more often if there were "more regular services".
"It's much easier to get here than into the middle of Plymouth - if there were more trains here you would have more people travelling."
Smith said the expansion "makes so much sense" as there is "clearly a demand" for it. She said it would increase the number of opportunities people have to use the railway as they "can't rely on the service currently offered at the station" as it was "not reliable enough".
"All the infrastructure is already here, we just need that platform extension," Smith said. "When I've met with Network Rail they have led me to believe that they are optimistic this can be delivered."

Conservative MP Rebecca Smith and John Pope from the Ivybridge Rail Users Group have both campaigned for a more reliable service for the town
Campaigners hoping to get a more frequent rail service at a station are "waiting anxiously" on the results of a survey looking into the possibility of extending the platforms.
On average currently only about 30% of the trains which pass through Ivybridge station stop there, a main factor of this being the short 104m (341ft) platforms.
Network Rail have conducted the £20,000 feasibility survey, which was funded by South Hams District Council into the possible expansion of the platforms, with the final costings being "undertaken and expect the report to be ready later this month".
GWR and Cross Country both support and welcome the proposals in a bid to improve rail services offered in the town. The two platforms at the station are too short to accommodate Cross Country's trains, which are a minimum of about 110m (360ft) long, as well as GWR's express and longer trains.
John Pope, chair of the Ivybridge Rail Users Group - which has campaigned for more rail services in the area for 21 years, said there was "currently an irregular service" in the town which was "very frustrating". He said the "timetables have not changed with the times - Ivybridge is now significantly bigger than it once was and the service has never reflected that".
"If the service was there, we are confident people would use it," Pope added.

The Ivybridge Rail Users Group have campaigned for better services at the station for 21 years
Cross Country said its trains could not fit on the platform, and its "train doors cannot be opened individually" so extending the platforms could "create the opportunity to connect this part of South Devon into our network".
While GWR said it supported the "long-term ambitions for improved rail services at Ivybridge and welcome the chance to call more services there".
Conservative MP for South West Devon Rebecca Smith conducted a travel survey where 94% of respondents in Ivybridge wanted more trains to stop there with 80% more likely to use the train more often if that was the case.
Matthew Dorsett, who was catching a train, said he would use the station more often if there were "more regular services".
"It's much easier to get here than into the middle of Plymouth - if there were more trains here you would have more people travelling."
Smith said the expansion "makes so much sense" as there is "clearly a demand" for it. She said it would increase the number of opportunities people have to use the railway as they "can't rely on the service currently offered at the station" as it was "not reliable enough".
"All the infrastructure is already here, we just need that platform extension," Smith said. "When I've met with Network Rail they have led me to believe that they are optimistic this can be delivered."
| Re: UK currency decimalisation (or 'dismalisation') in February 1971 - a discussion In "Introductions and chat" [380953/32623/1] Posted by RailCornwall at 16:46, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
I believe the 1/2p had to be introduced to avoid issues relating to the sixpence retention which was more or less insisted on by vending machine operators and manufacturers. Most of the higher value venders had 6d as an essential unit. The ability to build 2 1/2 p in copper to counterbalance equally the 6d was deemed essential.
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380952/32613/51] Posted by grahame at 16:43, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
You set the parameters at "a general better level of service", you are getting rather specific now!

Yep, that's why it's an e=x=a=m=p=l=e asking whether such a setup would be considered "better".
Ticketing suggestions seem sound, and you would have thought that with one organisation rather than numerous TOCs consistency would be much easier in that context, but we'll see. I doubt anything that reduces overall revenue will gain much traction given her other comments about reducing subsidy!
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................
Simplifying tickets - and truly doing so in a modernising way and not as a sneaky way for a general uplift of income while claiming "no rises" would be welcome. Sadly it would reduce the need for many of the skills and knowledge of members here, but that's progress. It would also progress, with gates like they do in The Netherlands, for 99.9% of tickets rather than what feels like 80% and so the need for so much work looking after fare advise, collection and checking.
| Re: Delay Repay bouncing around In "Smoke and Mirrors" [380951/32325/3] Posted by JohnM at 16:16, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Fortunately DfT/GBR have plans in place to ensure that the number of claims for GWR services reduces dramatically*.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.
* By removing the ability to claim for 15-29 minute delays, á la Cross Country.

I have to admit that change feels sensible
If you just mean it's sensible because it reduces GWR's workload, then sure. But why stop at 15-29 min delays?
Apologies if I'm missing something.
| Re: West of England Line - Soil Moisture Deficit Update - 10 October 2025 In "South Western services" [380950/30889/42] Posted by bradshaw at 15:22, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
Now the Environment Agency releases this update on the water supply. I does not look like the emergency timetable will end anytime soon.
Severe drought declared in parts of southern England
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwm243lrgdpgo
Not quite sure where to put this (and it is opposite of cuts as per thread title) so happy for mods to find better thread
A speech at TransCity South 2026 said potential for £14bn growth and 238,000 jobs in South West if Rail is improved
The Great Western Route has the potential to become one of the UK's most powerful drivers of economic growth, according to new findings highlighted by Joanna Grew during her opening keynote address at TransCityRail South 2026.
Drawing on insights from the Growing Places report, Joanna Grew outlined how the railway corridor stretching from London Paddington to Penzance could support thousands of new jobs, stimulate investment and unlock significant economic value across the regions it serves.
The report reveals that the Great Western Route could support as many as 238,000 jobs while generating more than £14 billion in annual economic value. The figures underline the critical role that rail infrastructure can play in connecting communities, attracting investment and supporting long-term regional growth.
Addressing delegates from across the rail industry and supply chain, Joanna Grew explored how development around stations has the potential to drive economic regeneration, create employment opportunities and strengthen local economies. The benefits extend well beyond passenger journeys, with improved connectivity helping businesses access talent, markets and investment opportunities more effectively.
The keynote also highlighted the strategic importance of continued railway investment, particularly at a time when regional growth and levelling up remain key priorities across the UK. By maximising the potential of station-led development and transport connectivity, the Great Western Route could become a cornerstone of future economic prosperity.
Drawing on insights from the Growing Places report, Joanna Grew outlined how the railway corridor stretching from London Paddington to Penzance could support thousands of new jobs, stimulate investment and unlock significant economic value across the regions it serves.
The report reveals that the Great Western Route could support as many as 238,000 jobs while generating more than £14 billion in annual economic value. The figures underline the critical role that rail infrastructure can play in connecting communities, attracting investment and supporting long-term regional growth.
Addressing delegates from across the rail industry and supply chain, Joanna Grew explored how development around stations has the potential to drive economic regeneration, create employment opportunities and strengthen local economies. The benefits extend well beyond passenger journeys, with improved connectivity helping businesses access talent, markets and investment opportunities more effectively.
The keynote also highlighted the strategic importance of continued railway investment, particularly at a time when regional growth and levelling up remain key priorities across the UK. By maximising the potential of station-led development and transport connectivity, the Great Western Route could become a cornerstone of future economic prosperity.
https://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/articles/great-western-route-could-unlock-238000-jobs-and-deliver-ps14bn-annual-economic-boost
| Re: Publicly owned rail is popular but does it make the trains run on time? In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380948/32613/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:17, 15th October 2026 | ![]() |
"No offers of a general better level of service" - sure about that?
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
https://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/25506607.mp-heidi-alexander-promises-better-buses-reliable-trains/
“No more Sundays wondering if the train will turn up. No more baffling array of ticket types and prices - a public service, where reliability is the watchword and pride is restored.
“Great British Railways is coming soon and will be run by the people for the people.”
It depends, I suppose, on how you define "better" and how you measure "level".
A train every 15 minutes from Bristol Temple Meads to Bath Spa, calling at Keynsham, Oldfield Park and Bath Spa. Two carrying on via Chippenham and Swindon in the hour (one each to Bedford and London) and two via Westbury to London via Salisbury (all stations to Basingstoke) and to Southampton Central (all stations). A train every hour Swindon to Yeovil, alternating onward to or via Yeovil Junction and Weymouth. All trains at least 5 carriages long (London trains 9 or 10) and with timings to include 15% extra recovery time at key points along the way. ... Is that "better"?
Tickets - singles only, any time and off peak only, with off peak being for journeys starting after 09:30 and before 16:00, and after 19:30, 7 days a week. Season tickets to be replaced by smart ticketing, linked to your credit card or a Cuttlefish card (an overgrown Oyster) card. Railcards available for all, at Bronze, Silver and Gold levels offering 12%, 24%, 36% off all tickets for an annual fee. Holiday (rover) cards available for a week in dynamic geographic areas, no time restrictions.
You set the parameters at "a general better level of service", you are getting rather specific now!

Ticketing suggestions seem sound, and you would have thought that with one organisation rather than numerous TOCs consistency would be much easier in that context, but we'll see. I doubt anything that reduces overall revenue will gain much traction given her other comments about reducing subsidy!
Of course returning to the plan of shutting 90-odd% of ticket offices would be attractive to someone wishing to cut costs..................














