Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| "Rails into Ghost Town" In "Railway History and related topics" [369456/31255/55] Posted by Mark A at 17:42, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
"Rails into Ghost Town" being Chib Thorpe's notorious film account of his visit to Woodford Halse from Banbury in the dying days of the Great Central.
A brief glimpse of something before he heads off... what, at 1:16, has left the row of similar shaped things and is flying along on its own to who knows where? What's going on with that?
Mark
https://player.bfi.org.uk/free/film/watch-rails-into-ghost-town-1966-online
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369455/31251/30] Posted by grahame at 17:38, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
4: Melksham
Cancellations of local trains prolific due to rerouting of long distance services and low capacity/long single block section. Doubling or long dynamic loops would alleviate this problem.
Cancellations of local trains prolific due to rerouting of long distance services and low capacity/long single block section. Doubling or long dynamic loops would alleviate this problem.
8. Chandler’s Ford
Six miles of line singled in 1972, but crucially with double track sections at either end to allow a train to be held off the mainline whilst awaiting it’s turn to travel along the single line. Retained for freight and diversionary use, but an hourly passenger service reinstated in 2003. Seems to work relatively well as it is at present, so I wouldn’t have thought a high priority for re-doubling, especially with the cost of providing a second platform at Chandler’s Ford.
Six miles of line singled in 1972, but crucially with double track sections at either end to allow a train to be held off the mainline whilst awaiting it’s turn to travel along the single line. Retained for freight and diversionary use, but an hourly passenger service reinstated in 2003. Seems to work relatively well as it is at present, so I wouldn’t have thought a high priority for re-doubling, especially with the cost of providing a second platform at Chandler’s Ford.
At very very least, a Romsey to Eastleigh setup with double sections and the ends for Melksham, please. The Chandlers Ford section at 6 miles is far shorter than Thingley to Bradford Junction.
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369454/31251/30] Posted by grahame at 17:34, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
1 Yetminster station.
It still shows evidence of he broad gauge with the distance between the platforms. It was first doubled in 1859 to ease congestion of the steeply inclined section to Holywell Tunnel and Evershot.
It still shows evidence of he broad gauge with the distance between the platforms. It was first doubled in 1859 to ease congestion of the steeply inclined section to Holywell Tunnel and Evershot.
Yes, it's Yetminster. On the single line between Yeovil Pen Mill and Maiden Newton, and (re)opening a loop at least here would allow the service to step up towards hourly. Care to be taken where the loops go, mind - hourly could in theory be done already, expect that the irregular spacing would mean trains having to wait to pass at existing loops.
Looking at HMG's stated desire to put loads of houses around existing stations there aren't on flood plains, I offer you Chetnole City and Thornford Town. Hourly Weymouth <-> Westbury <-> Swindon <-> Oxford <-> Bletchely <-> Bedford service. Change at Yeovil Junction Lower Platform for Salisbury and London. Connections across the platform both ways at Westbury onto the Southampton to Portishead stopper. Change at Swindon for Cheltenham Spa and Birmingham.
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369453/31251/30] Posted by grahame at 17:20, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
6. Sea Mills.
Darn. I should have got that one, from my days working with the Severnside Community Rail Partnership.

It's amazing how photography from a slightly different angle can make some of these non-trivial!
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369452/31251/30] Posted by grahame at 17:19, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
0:Shiplake Henley branch
I must stop trying to answer these from my phone
0: is Exmouth
Yes, it is ... you are not the only one who puzzled a bit over that one as I clipped it quite hard. I would suggest no need for a second track / platform while trains can turn back quickly to Topsham - though if the service ups to more than two an hour, two platforms would perhaps be needed to one train can leave as the next pulls in
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369450/31251/30] Posted by grahame at 17:14, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
2. Bad Kleinen (east of Hamburg). Redoubling is definitely not relevant - the line is double, and the whole station has been flattened and rebuilt in the last ten years, still with all four platform tracks (which I think are all back in use).
You amaze me, staving, with your knowledge. Spot on, and like you I see no need here for more tracks, though there would be space for two through lines in the centre. Bit of a naughty picture to include. For other readers - it's the only one that's that naughty!
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369449/31251/30] Posted by TonyN at 17:09, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
0:Shiplake Henley branch
I must stop trying to answer these from my phone
0: is Exmouth
| Re: 05:40 Edinburgh to Kings Cross cab ride in real time In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [369448/31254/51] Posted by Timmer at 17:04, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
An opportunity to see this service pass non stop through York. From Monday it will now stop there.
| Re: 175s to GWR In "Across the West" [369447/28982/26] Posted by Timmer at 17:02, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Scarcely credible, however it's reported elsewhere that fighting broke out amongst the spotters on one of the final HST runs this morning - turfed off at Truro apparently.
One would hope that no members of this esteemed forum were involved - whoever he was, he's certainly a cheeky boy!
https://x.com/themblades1889/status/1999819955705880721?s=20
Can only assume someone was sitting in his seat.One would hope that no members of this esteemed forum were involved - whoever he was, he's certainly a cheeky boy!

https://x.com/themblades1889/status/1999819955705880721?s=20
Seriously though, sad to see this happening on the last day of HST operations on GWR or at any time on a train.
| 05:40 Edinburgh to Kings Cross cab ride in real time In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [369446/31254/51] Posted by Mark A at 16:39, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Timmer, Oxonhutch | ![]() |
Courtesy of LNER, good production values, weather in their favour: an uninterrupted view from the front of the service that calls only at Newcastle on its way up to Kings Cross.
Mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLcZp3FhxP4
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [369443/31203/26] Posted by grahame at 15:24, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
I was interested in a past year to see which stations had the heaviest footfall per metre of operational platform and recall that Windsor and Eton Central bubbled up to being one of the busiest. In GWR land, I would imagine that stations such as St Bureaux Ferry Road come towards the quietest; on a couple of uses the infrequent service there competes poorly with a frequent and quite fast bus service along the nearby main road.
Some examples for the 2024/25 looking up platform lengths in the sectional appendix
1701274/113 = 15056 - Windsor and Eton - passengers per metre per annum
6510506/(195+279) = 13735 - Bath Spa - passengers per metre per annum
655356/(185+185) = 1771 - Stroud - passengers per metre per annum
415576/(169+173) = 1215 - Redruth - passengers per metre per annum
60930/74.5 = 818 - Melksham - passengers per metre per annum
11864/110 =108 - St Budeaux Victoria Road - passengers per metre per annum
2449/(124+126) = 10 - St Budeaux Ferry Road - passengers per metre per annum
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369442/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:22, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Yep, deep clean required! No ability to do that at Westbury seems a bit mad?
For want of a bucket (+ hot water, bleach and a sponge!) the train was lost!
In some circumstances there is more to it than that. Human material can be infectious to other humans in ways that animal material is not.
I wasn't being entirely serious.
Looks like there is a bus replacement in place for at least one or two of the cancelled trips now.
| Re: 175s to GWR In "Across the West" [369441/28982/26] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:15, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Scarcely credible, however it's reported elsewhere that fighting broke out amongst the spotters on one of the final HST runs this morning - turfed off at Truro apparently.
One would hope that no members of this esteemed forum were involved - whoever he was, he's certainly a cheeky boy!

https://x.com/themblades1889/status/1999819955705880721?s=20
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369440/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 15:13, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Yep, deep clean required! No ability to do that at Westbury seems a bit mad?
For want of a bucket (+ hot water, bleach and a sponge!) the train was lost!
In some circumstances there is more to it than that. Human material can be infectious to other humans in ways that animal material is not.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369439/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:09, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Yep, deep clean required! No ability to do that at Westbury seems a bit mad?
For want of a bucket (+ hot water, bleach and a sponge!) the train was lost!
| Re: 16th August 2025 - Buses to Imber In "Buses and other ways to travel" [369438/29807/5] Posted by Clan Line at 14:26, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A, Timmer | ![]() |
Warminster Station forecourt: pm 13 Dec 2025
I've heard of buses running late - but this is ridiculous !

| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369437/29726/18] Posted by IndustryInsider at 12:58, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Yep, deep clean required! No ability to do that at Westbury seems a bit mad?
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369436/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 12:55, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
So there's passengers taken ill, crew shortage, and now to complete the set....
We also have an "unknown cause" on the later trains. Now up to ten out of 14 cancelled.
Public post on Great Western Enthusiasts on Facebook ... here are the comments.

My guess too that it needs a deep clean. Must have been a sudden incident - nothing awry ad it left Melksham at 09:10
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369435/29726/18] Posted by GBM at 12:51, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Plotted out from JourneyCheck - ALL cancellations across the GWR area are mapped. I have screen captured just the central area - there's also a round trip cancelled between Newquay and Par
Possibly more to come!
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369434/31251/30] Posted by stuving at 12:45, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
2. Bad Kleinen (east of Hamburg). Redoubling is definitely not relevant - the line is double, and the whole station has been flattened and rebuilt in the last ten years, still with all four platform tracks (which I think are all back in use).
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369433/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 12:35, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
So there's passengers taken ill, crew shortage, and now to complete the set....
14:19 Westbury to Swindon due 15:01
14:19 Westbury to Swindon due 15:01 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2025 In "TransWilts line" [369432/29726/18] Posted by grahame at 12:28, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |


Plotted out from JourneyCheck - ALL cancellations across the GWR area are mapped. I have screen captured just the central area - there's also a round trip cancelled between Newquay and Par
When I woke this morning and checked train times, everything was shown as running. I was down there to hand out Melksham printed bus and train timetables to anyone who wanted them
There were 18 Melksham passengers using the 08:02 this morning and a further 20 or so gathered at the station at a couple of minutes after 10, when the 10:10 slipped back to 10:12 then was shown "Cancelled" but perversely still showing "Calling at Chippenham and Swindon". The reason for the cancellation was only communicated when we enquired via the help point. This is the log thread - I will write up a "what should we learn" thread - although much should have been learned already - when I've sorted out a few other things.
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369431/31251/30] Posted by TonyN at 12:23, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
0:Shiplake Henley branch
| Re: ORR station usage data In "Across the West" [369430/31203/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 12:21, 13th December 2025 Already liked by Timmer | ![]() |
I would hazard a guess and say Winchester would be quite high up the list too.
118th place for Winchester.
| Re: Thingley Junction: how does it work? In "TransWilts line" [369429/29439/18] Posted by Mark A at 12:19, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Reflecting on the responses here, I'm wondering if anyone who uses the GWML London to Bristol services can recall instances of trains to and from London seeing major delays as a result of disruption that would have been mitigated by increasing the capability of the Thingley to Bradford junctions length of line.
Perhaps the impact is managed away from the London flows and on to people travelling Bristol to Westbury, and particularly to Melksham travellers - and also to freight trains from the various quarries (unlike human cargo, aggregate is notably indifferent to the ill effects of disruption, not so the clients).
Apologies for the lengthy way of asking if the rail industry's keeping tabs on the question: "How much per annum is the current infrastructure provision Thingley - Trowbridge costing the c21st railway?"
Mark
| Re: Europeran Rail Timetable In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [369428/28562/49] Posted by grahame at 12:15, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
Due to a number of technical issues affecting our production process we have made the difficult decision to delay publication of our next printed edition until the end of February. To reflect this change, the edition will be titled Spring 2026 rather than Winter 2025/26.
We know that this change to our publishing schedule will disappoint many of our loyal customers but we want you to receive a product that is accurate, up-to-date, and worth the investment you make in us.
All customers with orders for digital editions or the Winter 2025/26 edition will receive an email regarding their options early next week.
The Spring 2026 edition will be published in print format on Friday February 27, however we hope that it may be available to our direct customers earlier than this. We envisage that the digital version will be available on Friday January 23.
You can order the Spring 2026 printed edition here or the digital edition here
We know that this change to our publishing schedule will disappoint many of our loyal customers but we want you to receive a product that is accurate, up-to-date, and worth the investment you make in us.
All customers with orders for digital editions or the Winter 2025/26 edition will receive an email regarding their options early next week.
The Spring 2026 edition will be published in print format on Friday February 27, however we hope that it may be available to our direct customers earlier than this. We envisage that the digital version will be available on Friday January 23.
You can order the Spring 2026 printed edition here or the digital edition here
Ah - I wondered where it was!
This is still my printed "bible" ... and end of Feb works out OK for final planning of trips for next year.
| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369427/31251/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 12:01, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
6. Sea Mills.
Darn. I should have got that one, from my days working with the Severnside Community Rail Partnership.

| Re: Candidate for redoubling? AQ 13.12.2025 In "The Lighter Side" [369426/31251/30] Posted by ChrisB at 11:33, 13th December 2025 | ![]() |
5. Barnstaple?














