This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Passenger Assist to Stapleton Road
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380313/32569/21]
Posted by Phantom at 13:37, 1st October 2026
 
Ok, question from an out-of-county resident....

Do the trains generally calling at Stapleton Road carry a guard/train manager?

I know the station is unstaffed. Was wondering whether I can get there in my wheelchair. It does seem as though residents park on pavements there, looking at Google Maps, certainly coming off the trains from Bristol side (Pl. 1?)

Heading for Downend....is it safe around the station into the evening in winter?

Thanks all

Apologies, I am not sure how to share pictures on this site, but there was a "New footbridge installed in 2019 which provides step free access throughout the station"

However, only platform 2 has step-free access from the footbridge so people who can't use the steps to platform 1 have a long journey down onto Stapleton Road and then around Belmont Street to reach it.

There is no car park or taxi rank, and the nearest bus stop is 120 metres (130 yd) away on the A432 Stapleton Road

National Rail state the following
Step Free Category B2 station - step free access can be achieved to both platforms, however it is via a large station ramp. Access from platform to train is very steep, if you require assistance, please contact GWR Passenger Assist on 0800 197 1329.

https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/stapleton-road/

Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts)
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380312/10737/21]
Posted by Mark A at 13:36, 1st October 2026
 
Well Temple Meads Station T1 is 100% marked as a stop for the 8 in the timetables. At the following stop, they do pause before restarting the route, but skipping the stop at Temple Meads Station itself, even if there's no one needing to alight, certainly shows attitude.

Re: Two East Midlands Railway trains collide near Bedford, 19th June 2026
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380311/32151/51]
Posted by Electric train at 13:33, 1st October 2026
 
RAIB Interim Report published

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6abd271555bc01d752a7f17f/IR012026_261001_Elstow.pdf

Re: Weston-super-Mare - Birnbeck Pier restoration: ongoing developments and discussion
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380310/16547/31]
Posted by Phantom at 13:29, 1st October 2026
 
I am impressed not only by the rate of progress being made, but also by the fact that restoration is taking place at all.
I rather cynically expected a very slow committee to consider the matter, followed by a total collapse, followed by a report that "restoration is no longer viable"
Well done by all involved.

As a lifelong Weston resident, I share your views above
I honestly thought it was never going to be repaired, there have been so many false dawns over many years
But to see the footage of the new flooring being a quarter of the way through was something I never expected.

A local councillor (Mike Bell) mentioned he got emotional walking on it again, I can completely understand how he would have felt.
I spoke to him on the Waverley cruise from Weston earlier this year and he was very passionate about the pier

They just need to find someone to look after the main part of Birnbeck Island, though I have previously seen footage of repairs on the buildings already

I can remember walking out there in the late 1980s with my (now sadly departed) grandparents, so will be looking forward to how this all progresses

Re: Curves, loops, avoider lines
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380309/32572/51]
Posted by Mark A at 13:18, 1st October 2026
 
Lincoln avoiding line, Bradford avoiding line?

[edit] Relics of the crossing on Bradford's Hall Lane are slow to vanish. 2025. Older images record rails across the road.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/CwL2hx2uPBBooVug6

Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)
In "Across the West" [380307/28982/26]
Posted by REVUpminster at 13:01, 1st October 2026
 
Melksham 1312hrs

Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts)
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380306/10737/21]
Posted by chuffed at 12:49, 1st October 2026
 
I waited at Temple gate for the 8 and two went past me despite my signalling for it to stop. The third driver then told me I would have to get off round the corner and catch bhe next bus. Are they making it all up as they go along ?

Re: Rail passenger numbers and crowding published
In "Across the West" [380305/32283/26]
Posted by eightonedee at 12:19, 1st October 2026
 
The wording seems to suggest that whoever wrote this wouldn't know the difference between a train and a bowl of porridge

..or that no-one has checked the standard wording for decades? 

Re: Cross Country Trains - incidents, services and shortage of drivers - ongoing issues
In "Cross Country services" [380304/23364/43]
Posted by Witham Bobby at 12:07, 1st October 2026
 
Cancellations to services between Cheltenham Spa and Worcester Shrub Hill
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Cheltenham Spa and Worcester Shrub Hill trains have to run at reduced speed on the line.
Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed by up to 20 minutes. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Customer Advice
-
What has happened?
-
There is a fault with the signalling system in the Ashchurch area. The signalling system is how trains are kept a safe distance apart and directed onto the various lines along their journey. When there is a fault with the signalling system trains may need to stop at the affected signals so that the Driver can speak to the Signaller to confirm if the track ahead is clear.
-
What are we doing about it?
-
Trains are running and will be talked past the Tredington level crossing in both directions, this will cause delays to the services. We also may experiance some cancelaations because trains and crew are in the wrong place.

THis is on GWR journey check, but the same problem must be afflicted upon XC services on the Midland road between Cheltenham and Bromsgrove
-

Re: Class 175s to Great Western Railway (GWR)
In "Across the West" [380303/28982/26]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:53, 1st October 2026
 
Let's see if it actually runs, there have been many paths from Wolverton that were in, but then cancelled (sometimes twice).

There are still lots of 3 car units at Wolverton (and some have been there for 18 months), so potentially could be more than one unit coupled

On its way.  Sets 110 and 103 in GWR livery as a 6-car.

Re: HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) - Government proposals, alternative routes, discussion
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380302/5138/51]
Posted by Red Squirrel at 11:43, 1st October 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 

Wildlife arrives on time at rewilded chalk grasslands built along HS2 route

The trains may be running late, but the Western Slopes project is already attracting birds and insects on lands around the high-speed railway

The air is scented with the sweet tang of ladies bedstraw and made musical by skylark and blackcap song. An abundance of marbled white butterflies, small skippers and common blue damselflies dart over the flowering knapweed, yarrow and wild carrot.

That the largest chalk grassland in the Chilterns is full of wildlife may not surprise you. But the fact that it is completely artificial, only four years old and has been built by the much-maligned HS2, may do.

[continues...]
Source: The Guardian

Re: Rail passenger numbers and crowding published
In "Across the West" [380301/32283/26]
Posted by Red Squirrel at 11:37, 1st October 2026
 
There is some odd wording in section 3:

Passenger train kilometres includes only the distance covered by a locomotive itself and does not account for the number of carriages.
[...]
Passenger vehicle kilometres includes both the distance covered by locomotives and the carriages they transport.

The wording seems to suggest that whoever wrote this wouldn't know the difference between a train and a bowl of porridge.

Re: Curves, loops, avoider lines
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380300/32572/51]
Posted by PrestburyRoad at 11:30, 1st October 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 
Cheltenham Loop, also known as Cheltenham & Gloucester T Loop, and now known as Gloucester Avoiding Line.  Opened in 1847, closed in 1851, reopened in 1901 and continues in use.

Re: Curves, loops, avoider lines
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380299/32572/51]
Posted by Witham Bobby at 11:06, 1st October 2026
 
"On this day" reminded me of the opening 136 years ago today (1st October 1890) of the Queen Adelaide Loop at Ely, allowing train arriving there from the direction of Peterborough to carry on towards Norwich with carrying on into the station and having to reverse there. In the days of locomotive haulage that was a faff, and with unfitted freight trains a double faff.   For all the issues with multiple units raised by some members, the savings made by many of these loops melted away.

I have listed here ten historic loops and avoiders - no two the same, still existing (not sure about Queen Adelaide thiough) but some only just.

Westbury East to North
Rhubarb
Mainadee
Queen Adelaide
Reading (West to Didcot)
Foxhall
Norwich Avoider
Rose Street Curve
Laverstock
Frome avoider
Cannon Street

[snip]

What have I missed?   Should any of those not count?

Barrow-in-Furness Station - The Park South Line

Swansea - The Swansea District Lines

Two that just popped into my head

Re: Rail passenger numbers and crowding published
In "Across the West" [380298/32283/26]
Posted by John D at 11:05, 1st October 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A, eightonedee
 
Latest quarterly (April - June) usage figures have been published by ORR

https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/media/u3dhxikw/passenger-rail-usage-apr-jun-2026.pdf

For GWR passenger journeys are 3% on same quarter previous year

However as journeys might be distorted by split ticketing, these are the passenger Km

April - June 2026 1652m Km

And for comparison, Pre-Covid
April - June 2019 1573m

So GWR now 105.1% of pre-Covid passenger km

During which time have removed some 387s, scrapped (after accidents) some 158s, removed remaining HSTs, but only managed to put one class 230 into non-daily service, and barely get one 175 into daily service.

Am I missing something, or have they cut the fleet, and have 5% more
People squeezing on.

Curves, loops, avoider lines
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380297/32572/51]
Posted by grahame at 10:52, 1st October 2026
 
"On this day" reminded me of the opening 136 years ago today (1st October 1890) of the Queen Adelaide Loop at Ely, allowing train arriving there from the direction of Peterborough to carry on towards Norwich with carrying on into the station and having to reverse there. In the days of locomotive haulage that was a faff, and with unfitted freight trains a double faff.   For all the issues with multiple units raised by some members, the savings made by many of these loops melted away.

I have listed here ten historic loops and avoiders - no two the same, still existing (not sure about Queen Adelaide thiough) but some only just.

Westbury East to North
Rhubarb
Mainadee
Queen Adelaide
Reading (West to Didcot)
Foxhall
Norwich Avoider
Rose Street Curve
Laverstock
Frome avoider
Cannon Street

And here are a further 10 places where loops could have been a huge benefit - including one or two installed in my living memory.

Coombe Junction
Bourne End
Bere Alston
Cromer
Battersby
Morcambe
Georgemas
Fort William
New Holland
Bacon Curve

What have I missed?   Should any of those not count?

Re: Weston-super-Mare - Birnbeck Pier restoration: ongoing developments and discussion
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380296/16547/31]
Posted by broadgage at 10:04, 1st October 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby, Phantom
 
I am impressed not only by the rate of progress being made, but also by the fact that restoration is taking place at all.
I rather cynically expected a very slow committee to consider the matter, followed by a total collapse, followed by a report that "restoration is no longer viable"
Well done by all involved.

Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts)
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380295/10737/21]
Posted by Mark A at 09:59, 1st October 2026
 
The fact that climbing aboard the number 8 bus was a bit like getting on a fairground ghost train from the way it departed the stop and promptly dived into a grid of minor roads and then through a mouse-hole of a tunnel beneath the main line before managing to serve the site of Bristol St Philips station, from the stop outside which it picked up several passengers, though none dressed sixties-fashion.

The 8 is currently on a small diversion after leaving its its new stop due to road works. When those are finished it will go on a more direct route along Avon Street direct onto Temple Way.

Others have already mentioned the fact the new stop is actually easier for people to get to and use.

And remember the 70 and 72 buses also serve the stop on Station Approach so it isnt just the airport buses.

Someone remarked that its stop in Temple Gate also makes it easier to change from the 8 onto a range of other bus services - though whether the 8 also met all those services at other stops I don't know. Presumably the 70 and 72 can't use the stop vacated by the number 8 as they'd foul the canopy there.

Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts)
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380294/10737/21]
Posted by Mark A at 09:42, 1st October 2026
 
I had an event at the university this evening - at 18.45 there seemed to be a fairly steady stream of people exiting the new East exit, including plenty of non-students heading towards the number 8 and beyond.

Incidentally, I forgot to take a picture but the new University building has a Solari board in the lobby. I think it was supposed to be asking students profound questions, but I couldn't help wondering whether they were just jokes waiting for a punchline! 

It's these people: this page was written when it was commissioned but before its (permanent) installation.

https://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2024/december/tqec-wood-and-harrison.html

When I passed it it was running a single line: riffing on the sentence 'Fail to understand {insert_word}' which caused me a bit of self reflection. :-) I'll have to revisit.

Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts)
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [380293/10737/21]
Posted by Red Squirrel at 09:05, 1st October 2026
 
Cattle Market Road has a 4.2m height restriction, so it’s too low for a standard double decker bus. There is a redundant exit leading down to it from the station, but this would not meet modern standards. The cost of putting in fully accessible routes from all platforms, along with ticket barriers, would be high - especially given that it’s a Grade I listed building.

Cattle Market Road could link up with an alternative routing for buses heading along Bath Road, perhaps via Totterdown Bridge. But those heading for Wells Road wouldn’t easily go that way. And you’d have to remove the cycle lane and make it two-way, presumably.

Re: Also available on the Coffee Shop secure (https) server
In "News, Help and Assistance" [380292/29701/29]
Posted by grahame at 08:45, 1st October 2026
 
May to December 2026 timetables all now available via https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/nrtt.html - "better late than never" - I couldn't find them when I looked in the late spring / early summer - not sure if it was my oversight or their very late arrival!

Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026
In "TransWilts line - Swindon, Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury, Salisbury" [380291/31359/18]
Posted by grahame at 08:41, 1st October 2026
 
06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47

06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47 has been delayed between Melksham and Chippenham and is now 16 minutes late.
This is due to congestion.
Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2.

Re: Stagecoach, Exeter - The good, the bad ……
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380290/32565/5]
Posted by Bob_Blakey at 08:37, 1st October 2026
 
Since becoming eligible for the 'crusties' National Bus Pass our use of the predominantly Stagecoach-operated 'local' services has replaced many rail trips via Digby & Sowton.

The service provided by Stagecoach had always been somewhat hit or miss for a number of reasons:

In 2021 the opening of the new bus station, which was specified by the idiotic Exeter City Council to be smaller than needed to accommodate all the services wishing to use it, resulted in the previously co-located maintenance & overnight stabling facilities being moved to Matford just over 4 miles away, and partially on a route into the city centre notorious for traffic jams.

Services being cancelled due to the breakdown of ageing diesel buses.

Services being cancelled due to staff shortages and/or en route delays caused by the volume of traffic.

It is still not perfect by any means but the overall situation has been improved by the ongoing recruitment of additional drivers - many of whom are either female or fairly recently arrived 'BNO Hong Kongers' - and the deployment of a fleet of, so far, 20 Volvo electric buses. A well advertised increase in driver's pay has also helped.

   

Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [380289/32479/24]
Posted by bobm at 07:37, 1st October 2026
 
Due to the disrupted start there has been some late running as trains have been delayed at crossing points.

The stock for the 07:23 arrived into Barnstaple 12 minutes late.  It was eventually 13 minutes late setting out back to Exeter Central.

Coffee Shop (and some personal) review, end of September 2026
In "News, Help and Assistance" [380288/32571/29]
Posted by grahame at 06:15, 1st October 2026
 
The end of each month provides me with a natural break / review point.  Our "Coffee Shop" online forum gathers monthly statistics and I can look back and see how we are doing compared to months and years previous (in raw numbers rather than as outcomes), and it's also an opportunity to look ahead at personal diaries, plans, finances, and so on.

This is starting as a Coffee Shop post.  In September, we had 1,309 new posts - some into topics that have been running for months or years, others into the 127 new topics started in the month.  These numbers are stable and that's the trend for the last five years. I find it remarkable that we find so much to 'talk' about - even new topics - especially in the light of the general dominance of social media these days, a worrying lack of new signups, and the known jolt of our restructure which launched in 2025.  To a sad extent, we have to thank (First) Great Western, the Department for Transport, Network Rail, and wider government(s) and indeed others for providing us with too many negative things to talk about along with the positives.  If train reliability was at 99% rather than 90%, if new lines had opened when completed at December 2024 rather than still not running, and if the fare system had had the shock of being simplified rather than changed with more seeming gerrymandering, perhaps we would be travelling more and writing here less.

New posts for the past 5 years


New topics for the past 5 years


I see systems changing with "nationalisation" and I write that in quotes intentionally.  There's a potential change in overall direction and management here, though it's far too early to have any certainties confirmed by seeing changes as we travel.  Rather like a big ship sailing, we know it's going to happen, we see the headlines of where it might be going, we hear the hype of how good the journey and facilities provided as we cruise away will be ... but ... that first movement from the shore as we cast off is barely visible to us, and indeed the ropes that hold the old legal framework in place have not yet been fully released as more legislation is awaited.

Continuing the cruise analogy, we have far to go and we'll see some very different places along the way.  Passenger have chosen / voted with their feet to come on this cruise, but we are now very much in the hands of the captains and crew and have very little influence over them. The running company changed the captain in July, replacing the one who was seen as struggling to manage a ship that has various issues with another who still has those issues to manage but is perhaps more charismatic and has different priorities. And who can both steer the passengers towards certain facilities and onboard products, and can make other facilities rather more expensive.  As we sail off, he has a honeymoon period during which he will be forgiven plenty.

Have you ever been on a cruise?  Lisa and I have done a number of them. They don't always go as planned.  We were due at port call at Corner Brook in Newfoundland on Aurora, but with an impending storm coming up the coast, we put out into the Atlantic to ride out the storm - holiday resumed with a little disappointment (and no compensation) but the missed stop forgotten by most soon enough.  Not a unique experience - storms stopped us making several port calls on a Transatlantic crossing that stretched 6 sea days into 10, and the Bay of Biscay and a windy Southampton put Iona back by 24 hours - again forgotten over time.  We had a cruise booked to the Baltic and St Petersburg but due to some a major falling out between Russia and Europe, changes we made that left out key ports - to the extent that we pulled out of that cruise completely - what had been booked in good faith, and not for the fault of the cruise line, had changed into something unrecognisable and not fit for (our) purpose.  And - these days - the cruise line we have been using and faithful to - has tightened its rules to the extent that with our mobility issues it is, frankly, difficult to get a booking and there's an uneasy feeling that our custom has become something of a nuisance.  I digress, and perhaps take the analogy too far.

We don't know what will hit with the rail industry and Coffee Shop topics and transaction levels as a result.  We can analyse what we have been told, we can ask, we can prepare and have "plan B" options researched, and we can decide whether to kick like h*ll or roll over and stoically accept changes.

Back onto Coffee Shop updates. The crew here - the admins and moderators - do a sterling job and we all have a lot to say "Thank you" for.  They are cruisers (oops) like you and me, enjoying the journey and the places visited, but yet with access and roles out of the public area.  And I am akin to the engineer and see my role as tuning / tweaking things to ensure safety, and as pleasant a journey as practicl.  Some of those tweaks are small ones. 

Now that we have had 18 months for our major refit to settle in, I have tweaked the boarding procedure - the front page.  You may have noticed some subtle changes over past days / the last week or two.

Firstly, I have made some changes on the home page, in the data block
1. It now defaults to the last 20 topics rather than the last 3
2. Topics times are also followed by dates where they are from before the current day
3. The time and date of the page generation is now included in the header line
4. Threads updated in the last 40 minutes are marked "Hot Update"
5. Threads last updated between 40 and 80 minutes ago are marked "Recent"
Where a topic is new, it is flagged as such in preference to "Hot Update" or "Recent" and not in addition

Sample front page showing changes


Second, the main viewing / editing page has a link to the live departure board for Birmingham New Street replaced by the word "Testing!". No code changes yet - but it will link to the station nearest where you are when browsing the page.  Some 1,000 of 2,500 stations - including (almost?) all in our area are in the 1,000; code work is needed to pull various bits of logic I have together to make this work, to not irritate by constantly asking for permission to track, and to know what to do when the request comes in when you are nearest to the other 1,500 stations.  I also need to check conversions between names and the variety of naming and coding conventions our industry has for stations

Third, I have restored "espresso" pages that were locked out of use due to an infestation of automated accesses for quite a while, and in testing them this morning I have found and fixed a bug that it wasn’t reporting "0" for new topics at the very start of the month.  The heading now included the dates range for which posts are summarised (this will help crawlers) and the report is two tone striped board by board to help your eyes run across.

Espresso this morning, with and without zero bug




None of these major changes; "steady as she goes" is the basic ruling, keeping legal, safety and privacy matters, including data security, to the fore. There are potential issues that can pop up unexpected, and others issues that we know may pop up into the future - we are not an isolated world, but rely on our suppliers and our customers.

Moving on from the Coffee Shop, the last 10 days have brought forward planning for the next year, triggered by (as I'm sure they intended) the Interrail sale that offered travel through 32 countries for up to 3 months. It has been their standard for the last few years to offer a sale with good discounts at the end of November, but this year there has been a sale with an exceptional discount (but with much more limited cancellation options) two months early.  Cutting a long story short, a lot of working things out at home, and a decision to buy, followed through in the last 48 hours together with checking on cash flows, etc; the next year's major travel dealt with in cost terms.   I somewhat follow online groups with regards Interrail; I have moved from being a consumer of the expertise of other group members into a much more centrist role, and have found myself answering lots of questions from nervous newcomers based on personal experiences over the past three years.

Which leads me on to something else I have been looking at / thinking about, and the start of a new month and the final quarter of 2026 - where do I spend my time and what and who do I 'support', and why?  I -love- being helpful (perhaps too much sometimes), and I get satisfaction from that help being effective - getting results - and of getting back some sort of flag to know I've helped.  And I -hate- waiting around, being let down, being ineffective, being needlessly rushed, doing something because someone's too lazy to do it themselves, answering after ship has sailed, and not being trusted will full information on which to help.  Wow - I suspect - no - I know - that the boot is on the other foot sometimes and I'll fail to provide feedback or answer as I probably should.

An email of 26th August, calling for no more than a confirmation of receipt on an important matter, has not even received the courtesy of that receipt.  A visitor to our home, an hour of advice willing given, and a follow up email to the powers-that-be to help someone's personal situation hasn't even been acknowledged by either the visitor or her chaperone/contact who set up the meeting, and should know better. A promise to fix / listen / contact has been lost into the cloud of - perhaps - other priorities and where that's a repeated pattern from someone it makes me less inclined to help them, and certainly warns me that I should not rely on them to - ever- get back with me / do anything they faithfully promise.

Pet Facebook peeves, then (and the Coffee Shop avoids most of these):

* Anonymous posts that have no reason to be anonymous. Why - when I declare who I am, should I interact with you without knowing who yo are?  And should I really "open up" when you don't?

* Names like UnforgettableAsparagus5913, SilverHedgehog602, CapableFlower5603 and KnowledgeableRaspberry2588. At least they help me know which anonymous person I am talking to in a sea of 'em.  Capable Flower indicates that he or she is not capable without help, and Knoweldge Raspberry shows a lack of knowledge. 

* Turning off comments as you post. So you ask a question in public that other would probably like an answer to, but then only leave private messages available for anyone who might benefit from an answer. Not exactly community spirit?

* "Sharon H***** turned off commenting for this post" and "Karen M**** turned off commenting for this post".  I love it when the original poster thanks for follow ups and appreciate that such messages may be added while I am composing an answer.  But why oh why turn off commenting in most circumstances?  It is so frustrating to write a long answer that's lost on submit because of this turn off, and which included other data that could be pertinent.

* Don't post wildly off topic, especially to advertise, and don't post with such volume that your inputs are discounted.  Make the headline of title line a good one, and don't make me read the first comment and click on a link in it to get the complete story

* Give me/us the full facts

And having said all that, I am perfectly happy to address questions that provide hooks onto which to hang informative posts ...

"Has anyone traveled to Bristol, England? Is it safe? Is there a recommended neighbor to stay in?"

Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [380287/32479/24]
Posted by grahame at 06:09, 1st October 2026
 
This'll be fun this morning ...

05:22 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple due 06:19

05:22 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple due 06:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to signalling staff being taken ill.

and all subsequent services to and from Okehampton and Barnstaple until lunchtime.

Oh - false alarm - looks like they're all re-instated.

Re: Barnstaple to Exeter overcrowding, September 2026
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [380286/32479/24]
Posted by grahame at 05:12, 1st October 2026
 
This'll be fun this morning ...

05:22 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple due 06:19

05:22 Exeter St Davids to Barnstaple due 06:19 will be cancelled.
This is due to signalling staff being taken ill.

and all subsequent services to and from Okehampton and Barnstaple until lunchtime.

Re: Hereford / Ross on Wye / Gloucester - new campaign for re-opening
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [380285/32562/28]
Posted by grahame at 04:08, 1st October 2026
Already liked by Mark A
 

Your positivity is always refreshing to see.

However, from what I can see on the map:

[snip]

You wonder what planet some people are on.

Thank you, and, yes, I do wonder. 

HOWEVER ...

* not all public transport is about proving transport for people living in the area it passes through; in the case of Gloucester to Hereford, I've seen it promoted as  South West / Central Southern to North West bypass avoiding Birmingham

* our government is demanding more housing and within reach if economic engines.  Take a five mile wide band from Gloucester to Hereford and you have roughly the same area as Milton Keynes ... population around 350,000 and a new city.

I would agree that as a line just to serve the localities along the way as they are, it has about as much chance as a revival of the Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore,


Re: Loganair to axe Isle of Man-London City route
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380284/32567/5]
Posted by grahame at 03:11, 1st October 2026
 
I would love to know if this should be characterised as a reduction (which it clearly is for some) or a re-arrangement.  How many flights from Ronaldsway go to London City, Heathrow and Gatwick each week on the current timetable, and how many will there be to Heathrow and to Gatwick in the new arrangement?

As a generality, I'm disappointed to see direct services lost. But yet where a service sprays out to multiple destinations which have connections between them, there is some argument for concentrating them all onto fewer routes rather than serving more badly.  In this case, lost between the BBC's potential headline grabbing and the Loganair marketing wording, I don't know where the balance lies.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025