Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:55 19 Mar 2024
- Potholes leave nations' roads at 'breaking point'
- The US Navy's relentless battle against Houthi attacks
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - WWRUG AGM
23/03/24 - Trains restart - Minehead
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

No 'On This Day' events reported for 19th Mar

Train RunningCancelled
06:30 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
07:04 Bath Spa to Filton Abbey Wood
07:45 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
08:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 25/03 16:00 Easter Escape - to where?
Closed 2024-03-16 Should our rail network go cashless
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 19, 2024, 06:10:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[93] Where would you recommend for an Easter Escape?
[93] More travels ... more looking at how others do it ...
[90] M25 motorway issue: a most illuminating Twitter thread.
[75] Briefing on forthcoming changes - from GWR on 14.3.2024
[48] Europeran Rail Timetable
[48] Improvements at three Berkshire stations
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • SWR / Trowbridge meeting: October 20, 2021
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 20th October 2021 - Special Rail Users meeting, Trowbridge, on "The Waterloos"  (Read 4594 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« on: October 02, 2021, 11:49:25 »


It has been announced that the train services run by SWR» (South Western Railway - about) from Bristol Temple Meads to London (Waterloo) are to be withdrawn in December in spite of them being very well used, and without like-for-like replacement.  This will have a major effect on many journeys and it does not look like a sensible or positive change. Furthermore, it was not well announced or consulted, leading to an impression of there being something sneaky about what's being done.

Rail User Groups and interested parties from across the area are coming together on 20th October 2021 for a public meeting (all welcome) near to TROWBRIDGE Station - meeting start time at 7 p.m. to allow you to come (or go) on the trains that are not in the timetable after 11th December.

Leaflet / flyer (please print and distribute if you wish) is at http://www.passenger.chat/bri-wat_20211020.pdf

Edit to add Zoom code - https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87440868321?pwd=bDcyd3R3Q0E0elVySlNreHBvcm1jQT09

An introduction to the issue is on the Two Tunnels site - forum redirect from http://www.passenger.chat/waterloo
More detailed technical stuff at http://www.passenger.chat/25503
Forum discussion at http://www.passenger.chat/25368

In alphabetic order (in the immediate area), this meeting is supported by
- Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways
- Great Western Coffee Shop Forum
- Railfuture (Severnside)
- TravelWatch SouthWest
- Two Tunnels
- West Wilts Rail User Group

Stations affected
- Bristol Temple Meads, Bath Spa - loss of through serviced to stations Andover to London (Waterloo)
- Keynsham, Oldfield Park, Bradford-on-Avon, Trowbridge - loss of through services to / from London
- Westbury - loss of the majority of through London (Waterloo) services
- Warminster - loss of the majority of through London services
- Andover, Basingstoke and Woking - loss of through trains to West Wilts, Bath and Bristol
- London (Waterloo) and Clapham Junction - loss of through trains to West Wilts, Bath and Bristol
- ALSO reductions to service from Bristol to Salisbury which often overcrowds even with the SWR trains running
« Last Edit: October 19, 2021, 06:40:14 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2021, 15:15:39 »

Trowbridge also loses most of its through services to London and all of those at a sensible time. Only through service is at "stupid" o'clock in the morning. There is no return service.
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2021, 15:33:14 »

Trowbridge also loses most of its through services to London and all of those at a sensible time. Only through service is at "stupid" o'clock in the morning. There is no return service.

My error leaving that out - I have edited the above post
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
FarWestJohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 235


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2021, 18:27:07 »

Seems appalling when Trowbridge is the Wiltshire county town. I would have thought the council would be shouting loudly?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2021, 05:28:09 »

I have edited the top post in this thread to add the Zoom code:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87440868321?pwd=bDcyd3R3Q0E0elVySlNreHBvcm1jQT09

Representatives of the Department for Transport and South Western Railway will be present and speaking.

Seems appalling when Trowbridge is the Wiltshire county town. I would have thought the council would be shouting loudly?

Their response to the 2022 consultation, which included the announcement (not consultation) of the December 2021 cuts, was strongly worded. Cllr Dr Mark McClelland, Cabinet Member - Transport, Waste, Street Scene & Flooding, wrote:

Quote
The recent publication of the Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail is welcomed. It places much more emphasis on a customer focus and the need to ensure that railway organisational structure does not impede progress. Prepared in a time of pandemic, the plan nevertheless clearly states the Government’s intention to increase passenger numbers, support tourism and revive high streets and cities.

It is therefore with some alarm that I see the message of the Plan being undermined so soon by a failure to maintain the very services that need nurturing to support discretionary travel; services that don’t fit neatly into the way the railway has been historically organised. This authority is trying to meet some of its local objectives by developing new rail markets: stations and routes. It needs confidence (as do rail users) that the objectives of the Williams-Shapps Plan will be delivered across the whole nation.

and within the five page response:

Quote
Remarkably, it has been suggested that withdrawal of the Salisbury-Bristol leg of services from Waterloo will provide rolling stock needed to strengthen services on the “core route” to Exeter (on which route, it is recalled, services between Salisbury and Yeovil are being cut). If leisure travel, and services in the South West are having capacity problems – and evidence suggests they are – then it is perverse to consider withdrawing services that provide links on a corridor with excellent tourism potential. One suspects that the Bristol route has the higher catchment population and that the “core service” label attached to the Exeter route owes its existence to railway history and the inertia that preserves traditional railway service operating boundaries. This is unacceptable.

and

Quote
Cuts to the Waterloo-Bristol through services should not be implemented until adequate mitigation measures have been implemented or other ways of reducing costs (for example by sharing traincrew with GWR (Great Western Railway)) are investigated.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2021, 08:36:09 »



Actually, Government is responding at 2,000 (in less than a week) - sending someone to our 20th October meeting. The $64,000 question is whether that response will be explanation, excuse, or something much more encouraging.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12330


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2021, 09:48:47 »

The former is expectation, plus a tad of the middle. But at least they are attending, and will likely listen.
Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18887



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2021, 11:43:22 »

Actually, Government is responding at 2,000 (in less than a week) - sending someone to our 20th October meeting. The $64,000 question is whether that response will be explanation, excuse, or something much more encouraging.

Lamb to the slaughter? Tongue
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2021, 11:58:09 »

Lamb to the slaughter? Tongue

Now - what or who be the lamb??

1. The through train services from Waterloo to Trowbridge, Bradford-on-Avon, Oldfield Park and Keynsham, which are supposed to cease from 12th December?

2. The campaigners who are going to be told "what for" and will have spent a lot of time, but still lose the service?

It can't be ...

3. SWR» (South Western Railway - about) and the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) - can't be them, because no slaughter is sought. We are looking for positive outcomes with a sensible, affordable, useful, appropriate continuing service and the intent of the meeting is to help everyone ease the wheels that way.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2021, 06:39:03 »

Meeting codes via http://waterloo.savethetrain.org.uk/meeting.html
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40645



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2021, 19:37:38 »

I am delighted to have the six groups who are supporting the campaign to retain the Bristol to Waterloo via Salisbury services running after 10th December, and who are on the "letterhead" for tomorrow night's meeting.  Someone from most of them will speak - briefly as the main purpose of the evening is to inform, make the case, and listen to the Department for Transport and South Western Railway, listen to the public, and move on to "where do we go from here" rather than let the campaign blow its anger out and have the cuts happen anyway.

* Richard Cowell, Chair, West Wilts Rail User Group to welcome everyone
* Mark Annand, Two Tunnels, on the background to the service
* Wendy Thorne, Director at Railfuture on future passenger metrics
* Graham Ellis, Webmaster at Coffee Shop forum on the threat to the service and options available
* Andrew Ardley of and for South Western Trains
* Martin Pierce of and for the Department for Transport
* Chris Irwin, Chair of TravelWatch SouthWest, chairing public discussion and drawing our path forward

Chris has a really challenging task to take us forward from what Andrew and Martin tell us - not able to be scripted as we see what mix of excuses, explanations, and encouraging news we hear from our guests.

Thank you too, in advance, to Roger Witt who will be taking notes online, Nigel Bray in the room, and to Bryony Chetwode who will be co-hosting remotely on Zoom.

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87440868321?pwd=bDcyd3R3Q0E0elVySlNreHBvcm1jQT09
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page